Talk:Star Wars: Combat: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[User:Kirkland|Kirkland]] 00:32, 12 May 2009 (EDT) | [[User:Kirkland|Kirkland]] 00:32, 12 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
Done. --[[User:FyreFly|FyreFly]] 00:48, 12 May 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 04:48, 12 May 2009
It occurred to me in the process of looking over weapon stats and trying to clarify certain things in my own mind that the simple/complex action system may be more than is necessary. It is a system that I like, but I'm not sure its a system that has benefits outweighing the negatives. Simply put, the time and effort to convert and specify everything might not be worth it considering we have to run a story and make the system as we go.
I would suggest we go back to a straight exalted system, I think it will be easier on everyone and we really haven't put much work into dedicating ourselves to the simple/complex system. I talked it over a bit with Dan and I think he agrees. What do you think Brian?
--FyreFly 02:12, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
It seems like "ticks" are just another way of doing the same thing. Quicker (simpler) actions take fewer ticks than more complex ones. I'm fine going back to an exalted style system.
Kirkland 00:32, 12 May 2009 (EDT)
Done. --FyreFly 00:48, 12 May 2009 (EDT)